4.1 Article

A novel WDR62 mutation causes primary microcephaly in a large consanguineous Saudi family

期刊

ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 148-153

出版社

K FAISAL SPEC HOSP RES CENTRE
DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2017.148

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Primary microcephaly (MCPH) is a rare developmental defect characterized by impaired cognitive functions, retarded neurodevelopment and reduced brain size. It is genetically heterogeneous and more than 17 genes so far have been identified that are associated with this disease. OBJECTIVE: To study the genetic defect in a consanguineous Saudi family with primary microcephaly. DESIGN: Cross-sectional clinical genetics study of a Saudi family. SETTING: Medical genomics research center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Blood samples collected from six members of a family of healthy consanguineous parents were analyzed by whole exome sequencing to identify the underlying pathogenic mutations in two members of the family (23-year-old female and 7-year-old male) who presented with primary microcephaly, intellectual disability, delayed psychomotor development and walking difficulty, speech impediments and seizures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Detection of mutation in the WD repeat domain 62 (WDR62) gene in a family segregating autosomal recessive primary microcephaly. RESULTS: The exome variant analysis identified a novel missense mutation (c.3878C>A) in WDR62 gene in exon 30 resulting in amino acid change from alanine to aspartate (p.Ala1293Asp). Further validation in the affected patients and healthy members of family and 100 unrelated healthy persons as controls confirmed it to be pathogenic. CONCLUSIONS: Functional impairment of the WDR62 gene can lead to severe neurodevelopmental defects, brain malformations and reduced head size. A missense mutation of exon 30 changed alanine to aspartate in the WDR62 protein leading to the typical MCPH phenotype. LIMITATIONS: Mutation was identified in a single family.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据