4.4 Article

Taxonomies for Reasoning About Cyber-physical Attacks in IoT-based Manufacturing Systems

出版社

UNIV INT RIOJA-UNIR
DOI: 10.9781/ijimai.2017.437

关键词

Cyber-physical attack; Computer-aided Manufacturing; Cyber-physical system; Internet of Things

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. Department of Homeland Security [CNS1446303]
  3. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1446804] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Internet of Things (IoT) has transformed many aspects of modern manufacturing, from design to production to quality inspection. In particular, IoT and digital manufacturing technol-ogies have substantially accelerated product development-cycles and manufacturers can now create products of a complexity and precision not heretofore possible. However, new threats to supply chain security have arisen from connecting machines to the In-ternet and introducing complex IoT-based systems controlling manufacturing processes. By attacking these IoT-based manu-facturing systems and tampering with digital files, attackers can manipulate physical characteristics of parts and change the dimensions, shapes, or mechanical properties of the parts, which can result in parts that fail in the field. These defects increase manufacturing costs and allow silent problems to occur only under certain loads that can threaten safety and/or lives. To under-stand potential dangers and protect manufacturing system integrity, this paper presents two taxonomies: one for classifying cyber-physical attacks against manufacturing processes and another for quality inspection measures for counteracting these attacks. We systematically identify and classify possible cyberphysical attacks and connect the attacks with variations in manufacturing processes and quality inspection measures. Our taxonomies also provide a scheme for linking emerging IoT-based manufacturing system vulnerabilities to possible attacks and quality inspection measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据