4.5 Article

High-fat high-sugar diet induces polycystic ovary syndrome in a rodent model

期刊

BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION
卷 96, 期 3, 页码 551-562

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.116.142786

关键词

ovary; RNA-Seq; polycystic ovary syndrome; obesity; testosterone

资金

  1. Jeffress Memorial Trust Program in Interdisciplinary Research [290172]
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute through the Precollege and Undergraduate Science Education Program
  3. Dr G. Ashley Allen '65 Student Research Grant
  4. H. F. Lenfest Endowment for Faculty Support
  5. Washington and Lee Summer Scholars Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obesity has been linked with a host of metabolic and reproductive disorders including polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). While a clear association exists between obesity and PCOS, the exact nature of this relationship remains unexplained. The primary symptoms of PCOS include hyperan-drogenism, anovulation, and polycystic ovaries. Most animal models utilize androgen treatments to induce PCOS. However, these models often fail to address the underlying causes of the disease and do not effectively reproduce key metabolic features such as hyperinsulinemia. Here, we present a novel rodent model of diet-induced obesity that recapitulates both the metabolic and reproductive phenotypes of human PCOS. Rats on a high-fat high-sugar (HFHS) diet not only demonstrated signs of metabolic impairment, but they also developed polycystic ovaries and experienced irregular estrous cycling. Though hyperandrogenism was not characteristic of HFHS animals as a group, elevated testosterone levels were predictive of high numbers of ovarian cysts. Alterations in steroidogenesis and folliculogenesis gene expression were also found via RNA sequencing of ovarian tissue. Importantly, the PCOS-like symptoms induced in these rats may share a similar etiology to PCOS in humans. Therefore, this model offers a unique opportunity to study PCOS at its genesis rather than following the development of disease symptoms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据