4.7 Review

Intestinal microbiome landscaping: insight in community assemblage and implications for microbial modulation strategies

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 182-199

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fuw045

关键词

alternative stable states; bistability; core microbiota; early warning signals; landscape model; tipping elements

资金

  1. Gravitation grant SIAM (Soehngen Institute for Anaerobic Microbiology) [024-002-002]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [250172]
  3. Academy of Finland [141130, 295741]
  4. Academy of Finland (AKA) [141130] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High individuality, large complexity and limited understanding of the mechanisms underlying human intestinal microbiome function remain the major challenges for designing beneficial modulation strategies. Exemplified by the analysis of intestinal bacteria in a thousand Western adults, we discuss key concepts of the human intestinal microbiome landscape, i.e. the compositional and functional 'core', the presence of community types and the existence of alternative stable states. Genomic investigation of core taxa revealed functional redundancy, which is expected to stabilize the ecosystem, as well as taxa with specialized functions that have the potential to shape the microbiome landscape. The contrast between Prevotella-and Bacteroides-dominated systems has been well described. However, less known is the effect of not so abundant bacteria, for example, Dialister spp. that have been proposed to exhibit distinct bistable dynamics. Studies employing time-series analysis have highlighted the dynamical variation in the microbiome landscape with and without the effect of defined perturbations, such as the use of antibiotics or dietary changes. We incorporate ecosystem-level observations of the human intestinal microbiota and its keystone species to suggest avenues for designing microbiome modulation strategies to improve host health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据