4.6 Article

Understanding the Origin of Irreversible Capacity loss in Non-Carbonized Carbonate - based Metal Organic Framework (MOF) Sulfur hosts for Lithium - Sulfur battery

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 229, 期 -, 页码 208-218

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.01.115

关键词

Metal organic framework; Lithium-Sulfur; Polysulfide; Encapsulation

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [OVT-DE-EE0006825]
  2. Edward R. Weidlein Chair Professorship Funds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Li-Sulfur (Li-S) batteries are emergent next-generation energy storage devices due to their very high specific energy density (similar to 2567 Whg(-1)) but are limited by polysulfide dissolution issues. In this work, chemically synthesized sulfur containing non-carbonized metal organic framework (S-MOF) cathodes show initial specific capacities of 1476 mAhg(-1) stabilizing at similar to 609 mAh g(-1) with almost no fade for over 200 cycles. Post-cycled separators of the S-MOF cathodes display complete absence of polysulfides after cycle 1, 20 and 200, respectively. It was identified that the occurrence of carbonate species in the MOF structure resulted in the formation of C-S bonded species causing retention of polysulfide at the electrode surface ensuring long-term stability. However, this observed capacity drop during the first 10 cycles is attributed to the oxidation of some of the infiltrated sulfur by the MOF as determined by electrochemical and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analyses. Nevertheless, the negligible fade rate (0.0014% cycle(-1)) and complete prevention of polysulfide dissolution renders these cathodes most promising candidates for Li-S batteries. Understanding of this transformation behavior in sulfur-containing MOF is essential to engineer chemically-bonded host-structures capable of efficient polysulfide trapping, a key pathway to establishing novel platforms for achieving high power Li - S batteries. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据