4.5 Article

Rapid and non-destructive detection of Pectobacterium carotovorum causing soft rot in stored potatoes through volatile biomarkers sensing

期刊

CROP PROTECTION
卷 93, 期 -, 页码 122-131

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2016.11.028

关键词

Potato bulk storage; Soft rot; Volatile biomarkers; Early disease detection; Bulk storage management

类别

资金

  1. USDA National Institute for Food and Agriculture Project [WNP00745]
  2. Northwest Potato Research Consortium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Early disease detection plays a significant role in the pre- and-post production management of specialty crops, that often are stored for several months prior to consumption. Potato is one of the most important specialty crops of the United States. However, soft rot in potatoes due to pathogenic infections during bulk storage, accounts for substantial losses to the industry. This study was aimed at assessing the applicability of an emerging technology, portable field asymmetric ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS), towards early detection of soft rot in potatoes during bulk storage. The FAIMS senses mobility of ions pertinent to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released from inoculated tubers. In this study, potato tubers, inoculated with Pectobacterium carotovorum causing soft rot, were analyzed using FAIMS over a 30-day period in storage. Sterile water inoculated tubers were considered as healthy controls. Results suggest that FAIMS can detect soft rot as early as two days after inoculation (DAI) by effectively capturing VOCs associated with rot progression. The activity of pathogen and associated VOCs release was maximum during the second week after inoculation. A principal component analysis showed a clear distinction between the healthy and P. carotovorum inoculated tubers. Classification models, quadratic discriminant analysis and Naive Bayes with leave-one-out cross validation confirmed the validity of FAIMS response with accuracies between 83 and 100% for both healthy and P. carotovorum inoculated tubers. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据