4.7 Article

Ameliorative effect of nicorandil on high fat diet induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in rats

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 748, 期 -, 页码 123-132

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.12.017

关键词

Liver; Nicorandil; Pioglitazone; NF-kappa B; eNOS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an accumulation of excessive amounts of fats in the liver that is not caused by alcohol consumption. It is considered as the most common liver disease in Western societies. The aim of this study is to investigate the possible protective effects of nicorandil and pioglitazone, the benefits of their combination and the possible mechanism underlie these effects in NAFLD. Rats were fed a high-fat diet (HFD) for eight weeks to induce NAFLD. In the next eight weeks, rats were fed the HFD along with pioglitazone (4 mg/kg) or nicorandil in two dose levels (3 or 15 mg/kg), alone or in combination. Chronic HFD administration resulted in significant elevations in serum levels of liver enzymes, total cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose, insulin and HOMA-IR index as compared with the control group. This was coupled with significant increments in liver triglycerides, MDA content and TNF-alpha as well as a significant reduction in liver GSH content. In comparison with the control group; liver expression of NF-kappa B was significantly elevated while liver eNOS expression and nitric oxide content were significantly decreased in HFD group. Treatment with pioglitazone or nicorandil either alone or in combination successfully ameliorated the deleterious effects of HFD on the all previous parameters. In conclusion, this investigation indicates a novel role of nicorandil in rats with NAFLD. This effect is mediated through, nitric oxide donor, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, leading to improvement of insulin resistance. It is worth mentioning that the combinations were more effective than the individual drugs. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据