4.7 Article

Effect of niobium doping on the structure and electrochemical performance of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3o2 cathode materials for lithium ion batteries

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 43, 期 4, 页码 3866-3872

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.12.048

关键词

Lithium-ion battery; Cathode; LiNi0.5Co0 Mn-2(0) O-3(2); Nb doping

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M562322]
  2. Science and Technology Pillar Program of Sichuan University [2014GZ0077]
  3. Development of Advanced Electrode and Electrolytes for LIB (AutoCRC Project) [1-111]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [201506133]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Key issues including poor rate capability and limited cycle life span should be addressed for the extended application of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 cathode. The suppressed Li+/Ni2+ site exchange, enlarged LiO2 inter-slab space and reduced impedance, which could facilitate the structure stability, were achieved by controlled Niobium (Nb) doping and contributed to enhanced performance even at elevated temperature (55 degrees C). The detailed role of the doped Nb was investigated thoroughly and systematically with the help of XRD, SEM, XPS and related electrochemical tests. The full and accurate results demonstrate that the Li(Ni0.5Co0.2Mn0.3)(0.99)Nb0.01O2 sample with appropriate Nb doping amount possess high capacity retention of 93.77% after 100 cycles at 1.0 C and improved rate performance with 125.5 mA h g(-1) at 5.0 C, which are much better than that of the LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2. Moreover, at high temperature of 55 C, Nb doping shows more remarkable effect on stabilizing the structure and 88.63% of the initial reversible capacity could be retained, which is similar to 20% higher than the LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2. This study intensively determines that controlled Nb doping could be effectively maintain the structure stability of advanced LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 cathode and promote the development of high energy density lithium ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据