4.3 Article

Determination of Phthalic Acid Esters in Seawater and Sediment by Solid-phase Microextraction and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 45, 期 3, 页码 348-355

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2040(17)60999-X

关键词

Phthalic acid esters; Solid-phase microextraction; Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; Seawater; Sediment

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41320104008]
  2. AoShan Talents Program of Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology of China [2015 ASTP]
  3. Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences [DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2040(17)60999-X]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phthalic acid esters ( PAEs), as the most important plasticizers, are widely used in the production of plastic products. The accurate analysis of PAEs in seawater and sediment would be of great significance in studying the transformation of PAEs and their ecological effects in marine environment. In this study, the method of gas chromatography- mass spectrum detector coupled with solid- phase microextraction was established to analyze the concentration of PAEs in seawater and sediment, and the experimental conditions, such as extraction time and extraction temperature, were optimized. Under the optimum conditions, the precision of this method was less than 10.0%, and the limits of detection were 0.04- 0.32 ng L-1 and 0.12-(1.6) mu kg- 1. Except dimethyl phthalate, the recovery of PAEs in seawater and sediment ranged from 68.0% to 114.0% and 76.4% to 105.0%, respectively. Moreover, the concentrations of PAEs measured by the method were 0.270- 1.39 mu g L-1 and 0.79- 34.8 mu kg(-1) in seawater and sediment samples of Changjiang River Estuary and its adjacent area, respectively. In conclusion, the analytical method is easy to operate and reduces the extraction volume of seawater. Thus, this method meets the requirements of the analysis of PAEs in coastal seawater and sediment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据