4.7 Article

Multiple criteria decision analysis based on Shapley fuzzy measures and interval-valued hesitant fuzzy linguistic numbers

期刊

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
卷 105, 期 -, 页码 28-38

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2016.12.046

关键词

Multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA); Interval-valued hesitant fuzzy linguistic sets (IVHFLSs); Linguistic scale functions; Shapley fuzzy measures; Generalized Choquet integrals

资金

  1. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0037]
  2. Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [14YJA630019]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in UIBE [15QD08]
  4. China Scholarship Council [201506030031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hesitant fuzzy sets (HFSs) are powerful tools in managing simultaneous sources of vagueness. Inspired by HFSs, interval-valued hesitant fuzzy linguistic sets (IVHFLSs) combine linguistic term sets and interval valued hesitant fuzzy sets (IVHFSs) together to flexibly characterize uncertain information from simultaneous sources. The purpose of this paper is to investigate effective ways to aggregate such uncertain information and then apply them to multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA). First, two interval valued hesitant fuzzy linguistic Choquet integrals are proposed to characterize the interdependent characteristics between criteria. Then, based on the Shapley fuzzy measures, we develop two kinds of generalized interval-valued hesitant fuzzy linguistic Shapley Choquet integrals to globally characterize interactions between criteria combinations. A model designed to obtain the optimal Shapley fuzzy measures is then constructed. Furthermore, an approach to interval-valued hesitant fuzzy linguistic MCDA is developed based on the proposed aggregation operators. Finally, a numerical example and a detailed discussion are provided to illustrate the application of the proposed approach and to demonstrate its practicality and effectiveness, respectively. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据