4.8 Article

Graphene Oxide Decorated with Ru(II)-Polyethylene Glycol Complex for Lysosome-Targeted Imaging and Photodynamic/Photothermal Therapy

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 6761-6771

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b13808

关键词

graphene oxide; Ru(II) complex; photodynamic therapy; photothermal therapy; lysosome; apoptosis

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [21231007, 21572282, 21571196]
  2. 973 program [2014CB845604, 2015CB856301]
  3. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [2015A030306023]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of photothermal therapy (PTT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) can kill cancer cells more efficiently as Wel compared with PTT or PDT treatment alone. In this work, we use nanohybrid rGO-Ru-PEG composed of reduced nanographene oxide (rGO) sheet and a phosphorescent polyethylene glycol modified Ru(II) complex (Ru-PEG) for combined PTT and PDT of cancer. Photosensitizer and imaging agent Ru-PEG is decorated onto delivery and PTT agent rGO via, pi-pi stacking and hydrophobic interactions. The chemical structure and morphology have been characterized by various methods. The release of Ru-PEG from rGO surface is pH-dependent, and irradiation can increase the release rate considerably. The combined effects of PDT and PTT have been evaluated by cytotoxicity assay under serial irradiation at 808 nm (PTT) and 450 nm (PDT). Mechanism investigation shows that the nanohybrid can induce apoptosis through generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cathepsin-initiated apoptotic signaling pathways under light excitation. rGO-Ru-PEG can be applied to in vivo photothermal imaging, and high treatment efficacy was achieved for in vivo antitumor experiments when irradiated with an 808 nm laser and a 450 nm laser. Our work provides an effective strategy for the construction of multifunctional imaging and phototherapeutic nanohybrids for the treatment of cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据