4.5 Review

Pathway analysis of complex diseases for GWAS, extending to consider rare variants, multi-omics and interactions

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS
卷 1861, 期 2, 页码 335-353

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.11.030

关键词

Pathway analysis; Genome-wide association study (GWAS); Complex disease; Multi-omics; Interaction; Rare variants

资金

  1. Research Grant Council of Hong Kong [PolyU 5637/12M]
  2. Hong Kong Polytechnic University [87TP, 87U7, G-YBK2]
  3. Endowed Professorship Scheme (KB Woo Family Endowed Professorship in Optometry) of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) is a major method for studying the genetics of complex diseases. Finding all sequence variants to explain fully the aetiology of a disease is difficult because of their small effect sizes. To better explain disease mechanisms, pathway analysis is used to consolidate the effects of multiple variants, and hence increase the power of the study. While pathway analysis has previously been performed within GWAS only, it can now be extended to examining rare variants, other -omics and interaction data. Scope of review: 1. Factors to consider in the choice of software for GWAS pathway analysis. 2. Examples of how pathway analysis is used to analyse rare variants, other -omics and interaction data. Major conclusions: To choose appropriate software tools, factors for consideration include covariate compatibility, null hypothesis, one- or two-step analysis required, curation method of gene sets, size of pathways, and size of flanking regions to define gene boundaries. For rare variants, analysis performance depends on consistency between assumed and actual effect distribution of variants. Integration of other -omics data and interaction can better explain gene functions. General significance: Pathway analysis methods will be more readily used for integration of multiple sources of data, and enable more accurate prediction of phenotypes. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据