4.8 Article

Bilayer Polymer Metacomposites Containing Negative Permittivity Layer for New High-k Materials

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 1793-1800

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b12786

关键词

high-k material; negative permittivity; metamaterial; dielectric property; multilayer composite

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51402271]
  2. Foundation for Outstanding Young Scientist in Shandong Province [BS2014CL003]
  3. Qingdao Science and Technology Plan [14-2-4-118-jch]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [201413001]
  5. Shandong and Qingdao Postdoctoral Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polymer matrix high-k composites are of considerable interest in various electronic devices, such as capacitors, antennas, actuators, etc. However, how to enhance the permittivity without elevating the loss remains a challenge for us. Here we present a novel design of bilayer high-k metacomposites consisting of two stacked single layers with positive permittivity and negative permittivity. Interestingly, the bilayer system shows an obvious permittivity boost effect with a permittivity improved by a 40-fold increase compared with the polymer matrix, while maintaining a loss tangent as low as 0.06. Further calculation results indicate that the permittivity of the bilayer composites could be enhanced by 4000-fold or even a greater increase as compared with the polymer matrix via balancing the dielectric properties of single layers. Insights into how the thickness ratios and dielectric properties of single layers interfere with the dielectric performances of bilayer composites were discussed. This study provides a new route for the design of high-k materials, and it will have great significance on the development of dielectric materials. Hopefully, multilayer high-k metacomposites with fascinating dielectric performances could be achieved via balancing the dielectric properties of single layers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据