4.6 Article

Long run discharge, performance and efficiency of primary Silicon-air cells with alkaline electrolyte

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 225, 期 -, 页码 215-224

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.120

关键词

Battery; Silicon-air; passivation; alkaline media; corrosion

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [03SF0486C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Si-air batteries, unlike other resource efficient metal-air batteries that were subject of investigations for quite a long time, came to the focus of research only recently. When operated with alkaline electrolyte, severe limitations of the discharge capacities were reported, which were attributed to a passivation layer on the anode. As a consequence, only small fractions of the surface from Si-anodes could be used for discharge. The objective of the present work is to reconsider the discharge behavior of Si-air cells with KOH electrolyte and to point out how a discharge process can be put forward until the complete anode is exhausted. Operating Si-air cells with alkaline electrolyte causes substantial corrosion, which produces also hydrogen gas as a reaction product. Moreover, along with the dissolution of Si in KOH, condensation of silicate structures in the electrolyte has been observed. Both effects accelerate electrolyte loss in the cell. Therefore, appropriately balancing the electrolyte supply of the Si-air cell is a precondition for ongoing discharge. Specifically, cells with As-doped Si-wafer anodes with 0.6 mm and 3.0 mm thickness were discharged in 5 M KOH electrolyte at current densities up to 0.05 mA/cm(2) for 260 and 1100 hours, respectively. The drawback is that a minimum amount of electrolyte is required in order not to exceed 4 M Si content, which otherwise leads to a gelation of the electrolyte. Although a considerable fraction of the anode material is not transformed to electrical energy owing to corrosion, specific energies up to 140 Wh/kg (for 1100 h) related to the total anode mass loss were realized. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据