4.7 Article

The Melanoma-Linked Redhead MC1R Influences Dopaminergic Neuron Survival

期刊

ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY
卷 81, 期 3, 页码 395-406

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ana.24852

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [1R21NS090246-01A1, K24NS060991]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81471293]
  3. RJG Foundation [2011D004473]
  4. Michael J. Fox Foundation [9908]
  5. Milstein Medical Asian American Partnership Foundation
  6. US Department of Defense [W81XWH-11-1-0150]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Individuals with Parkinson disease are more likely to develop melanoma, and melanoma patients are reciprocally at higher risk of developing Parkinson disease. Melanoma is strongly tied to red hair/fair skin, a phenotype of loss-of-function polymorphisms in the MC1R (melanocortin 1 receptor) gene. Loss-of-function variants of MC1R have also been linked to increased risk of Parkinson disease. The present study is to investigate the role of MC1R in dopaminergic neurons in vivo. Methods: Genetic and pharmacological approaches were employed to manipulate MC1R, and nigrostriatal dopaminergic integrity was determined by comprehensive behavioral, neurochemical, and neuropathological measures. Results: MC1R(e/e) mice, which carry an inactivating mutation of MC1R and mimic the human redhead phenotype, have compromised nigrostriatal dopaminergic neuronal integrity, and they are more susceptible to dopaminergic neuron toxins 6-hydroxydopamine and 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP). Furthermore, a selective MC1R agonist protects against MPTP-induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity. Interpretation: Our findings reveal a protective role of MC1R in the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system, and they provide a rationale for MC1R as a potential therapeutic target for Parkinson disease. Together with its established role in melanoma, MC1R may represent a common pathogenic pathway for melanoma and Parkinson disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据