4.8 Article

A PDGFRα-Mediated Switch toward CD9high Adipocyte Progenitors Controls Obesity-Induced Adipose Tissue Fibrosis

期刊

CELL METABOLISM
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 673-685

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.01.010

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale [DEQ20120323701]
  2. French National Agency of Research (ANR)
  3. Adipofib program
  4. national program Investissement d'Avenir [ANR-10-IAHU-05]
  5. second Investissements d'Avenir Carmma program [ANR-15-RHUS-0003]
  6. ANR Lipocamd program [ANR-14-CE12-0017-03]
  7. ANR Maclear program [ANR-15-CE14-0015-02]
  8. Fondation de France [00056835]
  9. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  10. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-15-RHUS-0003, ANR-14-CE12-0017] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obesity-induced white adipose tissue (WAT) fibrosis is believed to accelerate WAT dysfunction. However, the cellular origin of WAT fibrosis remains unclear. Here, we show that adipocyte platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha-positive (PDGFR alpha(+)) progenitors adopt a fibrogenic phenotype in obese mice prone to visceral WAT fibrosis. More specifically, a subset of PDGFR alpha(+) cells with high CD9 expression (CD9(high)) originates pro-fibrotic cells whereas their CD9(low) counterparts, committed to adipogenesis, are almost completely lost in the fibrotic WAT. PDGFRa pathway activation promotes a phenotypic shift toward PDGFR alpha(+) CD9(high) fibrogenic cells, driving pathological remodeling and altering WAT function in obesity. These findings translated to human obesity as the frequency of CD9(high) progenitors in omental WAT (oWAT) correlates with oWAT fibrosis level, insulin-resistance severity, and type 2 diabetes. Collectively, our data demonstrate that in addition to representing a WAT adipogenic niche, different PDGFR alpha(+) cell subsets modulate obesity-induced WAT fibrogenesis and are associated with loss of metabolic fitness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据