4.2 Article

Carvedilol does not reduce cocaine use in methadone-maintained cocaine users

期刊

JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 63-69

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.11.005

关键词

Cocaine use disorder; Carvedilol; Clinical trial; Adrenergic blocker

资金

  1. VA New England Mental Illness, Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC)
  2. NIDA [R01 DA019885, KO2 DA021304]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The goal of this study was too test the efficacy of carvedilol (CAR), an adrenergic blocker, for reducing cocaine use in individuals with cocaine use disorder (CUD). We conducted a 17-week, double-blind, randomized controlled trial with 3 treatment arms: 25 mg CAR, 50 mg CAR, and placebo. Methods: One hundred and six treatment-seeking opioid and cocaine-dependent participants, who were also maintained on methadone during study participation, were randomized to placebo (n = 34), 25 mg/day CAR (n = 37) or 50 mg/day CAR (n = 35). The main outcome measures were cocaine and opioid use as assessed by urine drug screening and self-reported drug use. Results: No significant group differences were found for treatment retention with 56% of the placebo, 76% of the 25 mg and 66% of the 50 mg CAR groups (p > 0.05) completing treatment. The percentage (SD) of cocaine positive urines during the trial showed an overall treatment effect: 59.2 (38.9) for the placebo, 50.8 (33.8) for the 25 mg and 75.1 (33.2) for the 50 mg CAR group. In post hoc comparisons, neither the 25 nor 50 mg CAR condition differed significantly from the placebo; however, the 25 mg CAR group had a significantly lower proportion of cocaine-positive urines than the 50 mg group. No significant group differences were found for the percentage of self-reported days of cocaine abstinence during the trial: 72.9 (253) for placebo, 72.9 (29) for CAR 25 mg, and 59.3 (31.7) for CAR 50 mg. Significant groups differences in the proportion of opioid positive urines submitted were not observed (p > 0.05). Baseline cocaine withdrawal severity did not predict treatment response (p > 0.05). Conclusions: These findings did not support the efficacy of CAR for the treatment of cocaine use in cocaine and opioid dependent participants maintained on methadone. Further, CAR doses >25 mg should not be used to avoid possible increases in cocaine and opioid use. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据