4.7 Article

Water can be a probe for sensing glucose in aqueous solutions by temperature dependent near infrared spectra

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 957, 期 -, 页码 47-54

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2017.01.004

关键词

Near infrared spectroscopy; Temperature; Water; Glucose sensing; Multilevel simultaneous component analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21475068]
  2. MOE Innovation Team of China [IRT13022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Near infrared (NIR) spectra are sensitive to the variation on water structure caused by perturbations, such as temperature and additives. In this work, water was applied as a probe to detect glucose in aqueous glucose solutions and human serum samples. Spectral changes of water were captured from the temperature dependent NIR spectra using multilevel simultaneous component analysis (MSCA). The first and second level model were established to describe the quantitative spectra temperature relationship (QSTR) and the quantitative spectra concentration relationship (QSCR), i.e., the calibration curve, respectively. The score of the first level model shows that the content of free OH in water molecules increases with temperature elevation. The correlation coefficients (R-2) of the QSTR model between the score and temperature are higher than 0.99, and that of the calibration model (QSCR) between the spectral features of water clusters and the concentration of glucose are 0.99 and 0.84 for glucose solutions and serum samples, respectively. External validation of the calibration model was further performed with human serum samples. The standard error of the prediction is 0.45. In addition, the linearity of the QSCR models may reveal that glucose interacts with small water clusters and enhances the formation of the hydration shell. Therefore, using water as a probe may provide a new way for quantitative determination of the analytes in aqueous solutions by NIR spectroscopy. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据