4.7 Article

Biochar supported Ni/Fe bimetallic nanoparticles to remove 1,1,1-trichloroethane under various reaction conditions

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 169, 期 -, 页码 534-541

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.117

关键词

1,1,1-TCA; Groundwater remediation; Biochar; Ni/Fe bimetallic nanoparticles

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41273109, 51378208, 21377045, U1401233, 51578240]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0797]
  3. Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation [141077]
  4. Innovation Program of Shanghai municipal of Science and Technology Commission [15DZ1205804]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WB1313008, WB1516015, WB1616012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Ni/Fe nanoparticles supported by biochar to stimulate the reduction of 1,1,1-trichloroethane (1,1,1-TCA) in groundwater remediation was investigated. In order to enhance the reactivity of ZVI (zero valent iron) nanoparticles, surface modification of ZVI was performed using nickel and biochar. The removal efficiency of 1,1,1-TCA increased from 423% to 99.3% as the biochar-to-Ni/Fe mass ratio increased from 0 to 1.0. However a higher biochar-to-Ni/Fe ratio showed little difference in the 1,1,1-TCA degradation efficiency. In the presence of Ni, atomic hydrogen generated by ZVI corrosion could be absorbed in the metal additive's lattice and then produce a hydride-like species (H-center dot) that represented the primary redox-active entity. The effects of various factors were evaluated, including pH, humic acid (HA) and inorganic matters (Cl-, CO32-, HCO3-, NO3- and SO42-). The degradation of 1,1,1-TCA was greatly affected by pH. The presence of Cl-, CO32-, HCO3- and SO42- had negligible effects, but NO3- and HA showed a significant inhibitory effects on 1,1,1-TCA degradation. In conclusion, biochar supported Ni/Fe nanoparticles could be highly effective for 1,1,1-TCA degradation. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据