4.7 Article

Structural performance of nano-silica modified fly-ash based geopolymer concrete

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 135, 期 -, 页码 430-439

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.111

关键词

Fly ash; Nano silica; Geopolymer concrete; Structural performance; Micro structure

资金

  1. University Grants Commission (India)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fly ash based geopolymer concrete generally requires heat activation of different temperatures, which has been considered as an important limitation for its practical application. Such limitation can be overcome by the addition of appropriate amount of nano-silica in the mixture. Therefore, a fly ash based geopolymer concrete can be developed using 6% nano silica replacing fly ash. The structural performance of such geopolymer concrete in terms of bond strength, flexural strength and micro structural behaviour has been explored. Such nano silica modified fly ash based geopolymer concrete shows appreciable improvement in structural behaviour at different ages without any heat activation. The bond strength between reinforcement bars (deformed or mild steel) and surrounding geopolymer concrete materials (with/without nano silica) has been also compared to the conventional cement concrete. The nano silica modified geopolymer concrete exhibits better structural performance than heat cured geopolymer concrete (without nano silica) and conventional cement concrete samples. The microstructural properties of such geopolymer concrete (with/without nano silica) and cement concrete have been analyzed through Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM) with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis and X-ray Diffraction (XRD) techniques. The enhancement of structural performance is mainly due to the transformation of amorphous phase to crystalline phase in the geopolymer concrete matrices in the presence of nano-silica. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据