4.6 Article

Mode of Delivery and Asthma at School Age in 9 European Birth Cohorts

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 185, 期 6, 页码 465-473

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwx021

关键词

asthma; cesarean delivery; child; cohort studies

资金

  1. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) [241604]
  2. University of Turin
  3. San Paolo Foundation (Turin, Italy)
  4. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12011/4] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. MRC [MC_UU_12011/4] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evidence on the association between mode of delivery and asthma at school age is inconclusive. We assessed the associations between specific modes of delivery and asthma in children from 9 European birth cohorts that enrolled participants between 1996 and 2006. Cohort-specific crude and adjusted risk ratios for asthma at ages 5-9 years were calculated using Poisson regression models and pooled. A sensitivity analysis was carried out in children born at term to reduce confounding due to perinatal factors. The study included 67,613 participants. Cohort-specific rates of cesarean delivery varied from 9.4% to 37.5%. Cesarean delivery, as opposed to vaginal delivery, was associated with an increased risk of asthma (adjusted risk ratio (aRR) = 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02, 1.46). Compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery, the adjusted risk ratio was 1.33 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.75) for elective cesarean delivery, 1.07 (95% CI: 0.94, 1.22) for emergency cesarean delivery, and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.84, 1.12) for operative vaginal delivery. In children born at term, the associations were strengthened only for elective cesarean delivery (aRR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.97). The large sample size allowed analysis of the associations between specific modes of delivery and asthma at school age. The increased risk of asthma associated with elective cesarean delivery, especially among children born at term, is relevant in counteracting the increasing use of this procedure, which is often performed without a clear medical indication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据