4.7 Article

Investigation of the relationship between the rodlet formation and Cys3-Cys4 loop of the HGFI hydrophobin

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 150, 期 -, 页码 344-351

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.10.048

关键词

Hydrophobin; Self-assembly; Cys3-Cys4 loop; Rodlets; Amphipathic

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31170066]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province [2014021020-3, 2015021080]
  3. Scientific and Technological Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi [2015130]
  4. Shanxi Scholarship Council of China [2015-033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We used protein fusion technology to transplant the Cys3-Cys4 loop of HGFI (a class I hydrophobin from Grifola frondosa) into a nonamyloidogenic hydrophobin HFBI (a class II hydrophobin from Trichoderma reesei) and replace the corresponding amino acids between Cys3 and Cys4 in this protein to identify whether this loop renders it amyloidogenic. Water contact angle (WCA) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements demonstrated that the mutant protein HFBI-AR could form amphipathic membranes by self-assembling at the hydrophilic mica and hydrophobic polystyrene surfaces. This property enabled the mutant protein to alter the surface wettabilities of polystyrene and mica as well as to change the elemental composition of sili-conized glass. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements indicated that, unlike class I hydrophobins, no amyloid-like rodlets were observed on the mutant protein HFBI-AR coated mica surface. Moreover, the Cys3-Cys4 region could not catalyze the mutant protein HFBI-AR to drive intermolecular association and formation of a cross-beta rodlet structure to resist depolymerization in organic solvents when it self-assembled at water-air interfaces. These results demonstrate that the Cys3-Cys4 loop is not the major determinant that initiates HGFI to form rodlets or account for the unique properties of the proteins. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据