4.8 Article

Mass Spectral Feature List Optimizer (MS-FLO): A Tool To Minimize False Positive Peak Reports in Untargeted Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy (LC-MS) Data Processing

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 89, 期 6, 页码 3250-3255

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04372

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [U24 DK097154, R01 DK104351]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Untargeted metabolomics by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry generates data-rich chromatograms in the form of m/z-retention time features. Managing such datasets is a bottleneck. Many popular data processing tools, including XCMS-online and MZmine2, yield numerous false-positive peak detections. Flagging and removing such false peaks manually is a time-consuming task and prone to human error. We present a web application, Mass Spectral Feature List Optimizer (MS-FLO), to improve the quality of feature lists after initial processing to expedite the process of data curation. The tool utilizes retention time alignments, accurate mass tolerances, Pearson's correlation analysis, and peak height similarity to identify ion adducts, duplicate peak reports, and isotopic features of the main monoisotopic metabolites. Removing such erroneous peaks reduces the overall number of metabolites in data reports and improves the quality of subsequent statistical investigations. To demonstrate the effectiveness of MS-FLO, we processed 28 biological studies and uploaded raw and results data to the Metabolomics Workbench website (www.metabolomicsworkbench.org), encompassing 1481 chromatograms produced by two different data processing programs used in-house (MZmine2 and later MS-DIAL). Post-processing of datasets with MS-FLO yielded a 7.8% automated reduction of total peak features and flagged an additional 7.9% of features, per dataset, for review by the user. When manually curated, 87% of these additional flagged features were verified false positives. MS-FLO is an open source web application that is freely available for use at http://msflo.fiehnlab.ucdavis.edu.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据