4.6 Article

Hydrodynamics and mass transfer in bubble column, conventional airlift, stirred airlift and stirred tank bioreactors, using viscous fluid: A comparative study

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 118, 期 -, 页码 70-81

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2016.11.019

关键词

Bioreactors; Hydrodynamics; Mass transfer; Newtonian fluids; Non-Newtonian fluids

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2008/57873-8, 2010/04903-7, 2010/03764-3]
  2. Coordination Improvement Higher Education Personnel (PNPD-CAPES)
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [10/04903-7] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance of four bioreactors (bubble column, concentric tube airlift, concentric tube stirred airlift, and mechanically stirred tank) were evaluated in this study in terms of the hydrodynamics and mass transfer, using viscous a Newtonian fluid (glycerol 65%) and a non-Newtonian fluid (xanthan 0.25%). The experimental results showed that the gas holdup and mass transfer coefficient were higher in the stirred airlift and stirred tank, on the other hand these reactors had high shear rates. In relation to power consumption, lower values were obtained in the bubble column and airlift bioreactors. In a viscous medium in which microorganisms or shear-sensitive cells are used, the use of airlift bioreactors may be the best choice for presenting a low shear environment and a reasonable oxygen transfer rate, in addition to the low power consumption. On the other hand, if the process involves microorganisms that require high oxygen rates, a stirred airlift bioreactor may be the best choice. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据