4.7 Article

ECN Spray G external spray visualization and spray collapse description through penetration and morphology analysis

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 304-316

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.10.023

关键词

GDi; ECN; Spray G; Spray collapse; Spray penetration; Spray angle; Schlieren; DBI; DISI; Gasoline direct injection

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [TRA2015-67679-c2-1-R]
  2. Programa de Apoyo para la Investigacion y Desarrollo (PAID) of Universitat Politecnica de Valencia [FPI-S2-2015-1069]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inside a DISI engine, a wide range of pressure and temperature conditions are possible, and with the current evolution of the systems, many of the conditions are subject to be encountered at the moment of injection. Given the great differences between Diesel injectors and GDi fuel injectors, the effects of such conditions on the development of the fuel injected can cause phenomena like flash boiling and spray collapse that fundamentally change the behavior of sprays. In this work, the Spray G injector developed by Delphi for the Engine Combustion Network (ECN) group has been tested in a High Pressure High Temperature Constant Pressure Flow Rig (HPHT - CPFR) in a wide range of experimental conditions capturing the liquid and vapor phases of the spray by means of DBI and Schlieren imaging. The work presents the results obtained by spray visualization through comparisons of parametric variations with special focus on the collapse of the spray that occurs under high ambient temperature and density conditions. Spray collapse has been described by showing the direct increase that can cause in spray penetration and the great closing effect that can produce to the aperture of the spray (spray angle). Several contour comparisons using the raw images and the detected contours have been discussed in order to support and further explain the observed trends. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据