4.5 Article

Intelligent Multiple Search Strategy Cuckoo Algorithm for Numerical and Engineering Optimization Problems

期刊

ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
卷 42, 期 2, 页码 567-593

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-016-2270-8

关键词

Cuckoo search; Covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy; Reinforcement learning; Engineering design problems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents intelligent multiple search strategy algorithm (IMSS) as a new modification of cuckoo search (CS) to improve performance of the conventional algorithm. To do so, the proposed IMSS algorithm adopts a multiple search strategy and Q-learning technique. The introduced multiple search strategy couples CS and covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMAES) to explore search space more efficiently and also to reduce computational time of finding the optimal solution. More precisely, CS enables the IMSS to achieve better accuracy of final solutions through L,vy flights, and CMAES enhances its convergence rate via a concept known as evolution path. To provide an intelligent balance between the exploration and exploitation behaviors, the IMSS employs Q-learning method and thereby acquires information about the performance of each search strategy. Then, it uses this information to dynamically select the best strategy for evolving candidate solutions as optimization process progress. In other words, the IMSS algorithm transforms the task of learning the optimal policy in Q-learning into the search for an efficient and adaptive optimization behavior. The IMSS is evaluated on CEC 2005 and CEC 2013 test suites, and its results are compared with results produced by several state-of-the-art algorithms. For further validation, the presented approach is also applied on two well-studied engineering design problems. The obtained results indicate that the IMSS provides very competitive results compared to other algorithms on the aforementioned optimization problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据