4.7 Article

Enhancement of furan aldehydes conversion in Zymomonas mobilis by elevating dehydrogenase activity and cofactor regeneration

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s13068-017-0714-3

关键词

Zymomonas mobilis; Furfural; 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF); Reduction; Alcohol dehydrogenase; Transhydrogenase

资金

  1. National High-Tech Program of China [2012AA022301]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [31300070]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) are the two major furan aldehyde inhibitors generated from lignocellulose dilute acid pretreatment which significantly inhibit subsequent microbial cell growth and ethanol fermentation. Zymomonas mobilis is an important strain for cellulosic ethanol fermentation but can be severely inhibited by furfural and (or) HMF. Previous study showed that Z. mobilis contains its native oxidoreductases to catalyze the conversion of furfural and HMF, but the corresponding genes have not been identified. Results: This study identified a NADPH-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase gene ZMO1771 from Z. mobilis ZM4, which is responsible for the efficient reduction of furfural and HMF. Over-expression of ZMO1771 in Z. mobilis significantly increased the conversion rate to both furfural and HMF and resulted in an accelerated cell growth and improved ethanol productivity in corn stover hydrolysate. Further, the ethanol fermentation performance was enhanced again by co-expression of the transhydrogenase gene udhA with ZMO1771 by elevating the NADPH availability. Conclusions: A genetically modified Z. mobilis by co-expressing alcohol dehydrogenase gene ZMO1771 with transhydrogenase gene udhA showed enhanced conversion rate of furfural and HMF and accelerated ethanol fermentability from lignocellulosic hydrolysate. The results presented in this study provide an important method on constructing robust strains for efficient ethanol fermentation from lignocellulose feedstock.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据