4.5 Article

Colorectal cancer-targeted delivery of oxaliplatin via folic acid-grafted solid lipid nanoparticles: preparation, optimization, and in vitro evaluation

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/21691401.2017.1366338

关键词

oxaliplatin; solid lipid nanoparticles; folic acid; Box-Behnken design; HT-29 cell line

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranked second in females and third in males among all type of cancers diagnosed. About 1.4 million cases took place with 693,900 deaths in 2012. It can occur either in colon or rectum. Thus, we aimed to develop and optimize oxaliplatin (OP) loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs). Materials and methods: SLNs containing tristearin, 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DSPE), Lipoid S75, and Tween 80 was developed. Box-Behnken design was applied for optimization of SLNs and optimized formulation was selected for conjugation with folic acid (FA). Optimized formulations were evaluated for various physiochemical parameters viz., particle size (PS), zeta potential, %entrapment efficiency (EE), morphology, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Results and discussion: OP loaded uncoupled SLNs (OPSLNs) and OP loaded FA coupled SLNs (OPSLNFs) formulations revealed good EE, 49.20.38% and 43.5 +/- 0.59%, respectively and small PS, 146.2 +/- 4.4 nm, and 158.8 +/- 5.6 nm, respectively. XRD pattern and DSC results confirmed that OP was uniformly distributed in amorphous form within SLNs. In vitro drug release study of OPSLNs and OPSLNFs formulation revealed sustained drug release pattern of OP for up to 6d. Anticancer activity on HT-29 cell line indicated the highest potency of OPSLNFs as compared to OPSLNs and OP solution. Conclusion: The present work illustrated the higher sensitivity of HT-29 cells to the drug entrapped in OPSLNFs as compared to OPSLNs and OP solution. Hence, this novel strategy might be a promising approach for the management of CRC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据