4.1 Article

Overexpression of SIRT1 is Associated With Poor Outcomes in Patients With Ovarian Carcinoma

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000316

关键词

sirtuin 1; endometriosis; ovarian carcinoma; histone deacetylase class III; immunohistochemistry

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [24791696, 15K10711]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K10711, 24791696] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), originally identified as a longevity gene, regulates DNA repair and metabolism by deacetylating target proteins such as p53. SIRT1 plays a key role in the pathophysiology of metabolic diseases and neurodegenerative disorders, and is considered to protect against age-related diseases including cancer. In contrast, SIRT1 may be oncogenic because its overexpression has been detected in many cancers. The aim of the present study was to clarify the expression and the role of SIRT1 in ovarian carcinoma (OvCa). The expression of SIRT1 was evaluated immunohistochemically in 16 cases of normal ovaries, 35 cases of endometriosis with/without carcinoma, and 68 cases of OvCa (endometrioid, 16; clear cell, 20; mucinous, 16; serous, 16). Staining results were evaluated semiquantitatively by the Immunoreactive Scoring System, and the relationships with clinicopathologic features and outcomes of patients were analyzed. The expression of SIRT1 was higher in endometrioid, mucinous, and clear-cell carcinomas than in the inclusion cysts of normal ovaries, but not in serous carcinoma (P=0.038). The expression of SIRT1 on OvCa did not correlate with age, stage, location of metastasis, or capsular penetration. However, elevated SIRT1 expression was a significant predictor of shorter survival in univariate (P=0.038) and multivariate (P=0.037) survival analyses, regardless of the tumor stage. Results of the present study suggest a positive role for SIRT1 in the development of OvCa and its potential as a novel therapeutic target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据