4.7 Article

Condensed droplet growth on surfaces with various wettability

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 115, 期 -, 页码 1101-1108

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.01.060

关键词

Condensation; Wettability; Droplet behavior; Droplet growth

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51476084]
  2. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program [20131089319]
  3. National Natural Science Fund for Creative Research Groups [51621062]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Droplet condensation, which has better heat transfer performance than film condensation, improves the efficiency of various engineering applications. Since the surface wettability decides the condensed droplet behavior, which then decides the condensation performance, the influence of the surface wettability on the droplet growth needs to be understood. In this study, four surfaces were prepared including a hydrophilic surface (surface A), two hydrophobic surfaces (surface B and C) and a superhydrophobic surface (surface D) with the droplet behavior and the droplet growth properties investigated. The results show that the droplets have non-circular triple lines and non-smooth coalescences on surface A; the droplet coalescence on surface B is smoother but still immobile; most coalescences on surface C are immobile, but the self-propelled droplet motion occurs occasionally; surface D is a superhydrophobic surface, where the self-propelled droplet motion occurs frequently. These different droplet behaviors greatly influence the droplet growth on various surfaces. Generally, with larger surface contact angle, the droplet grows more slowly, the surface coverage fraction is lower, the relative standard deviation of droplet sizes is larger. However, on the superhydrophobic surface D, the frequent self-propelled droplet motion disturbs the normal droplet growth, resulting in unpredictable droplet growth properties. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据