4.7 Article

Estimating global nitrous oxide emissions by lichens and bryophytes with a process-based productivity model

期刊

BIOGEOSCIENCES
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 1593-1602

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-14-1593-2017

关键词

-

资金

  1. EC [282700]
  2. CARBOP-ERM project [03G0836B]
  3. BMBF (German Ministry for Science and Education)
  4. Max Planck Society (Nobel Laureate Fellowship for Bettina Weber)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrous oxide is a strong greenhouse gas and atmospheric ozone-depleting agent which is largely emitted by soils. Recently, lichens and bryophytes have also been shown to release significant amounts of nitrous oxide. This finding relies on ecosystem-scale estimates of net primary productivity of lichens and bryophytes, which are converted to nitrous oxide emissions by empirical relationships between productivity and respiration, as well as between respiration and nitrous oxide release. Here we obtain an alternative estimate of nitrous oxide emissions which is based on a global process-based non-vascular vegetation model of lichens and bryophytes. The model quantifies photosynthesis and respiration of lichens and bryophytes directly as a function of environmental conditions, such as light and temperature. Nitrous oxide emissions are then derived from simulated respiration assuming a fixed relationship between the two fluxes. This approach yields a global estimate of 0.27 (0.19-0.35) (TgN(2)O) year(-1) released by lichens and bryophytes. This is lower than previous estimates but corresponds to about 50% of the atmospheric deposition of nitrous oxide into the oceans or 25% of the atmospheric deposition on land. Uncertainty in our simulated estimate results from large variation in emission rates due to both physiological differences between species and spatial heterogeneity of climatic conditions. To constrain our predictions, combined online gas exchange measurements of respiration and nitrous oxide emissions may be helpful.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据