4.7 Article

Quantum walks: The first detected passage time problem

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
卷 95, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.032141

关键词

-

资金

  1. Israel Science Foundation [376/12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Even after decades of research, the problem of first passage time statistics for quantum dynamics remains a challenging topic of fundamental and practical importance. Using a projective measurement approach, with a sampling time tau, we obtain the statistics of first detection events for quantum dynamics on a lattice, with the detector located at the origin. A quantum renewal equation for a first detection wave function, in terms of which the first detection probability can be calculated, is derived. This formula gives the relation between first detection statistics and the solution of the corresponding Schrodinger equation in the absence of measurement. We illustrate our results with tight-binding quantum walk models. We examine a closed system, i.e., a ring, and reveal the intricate influence of the sampling time tau on the statistics of detection, discussing the quantum Zeno effect, half dark states, revivals, and optimal detection. The initial condition modifies the statistics of a quantum walk on a finite ring in surprising ways. In some cases, the average detection time is independent of the sampling time while in others the average exhibits multiple divergences as the sampling time is modified. For an unbounded one-dimensional quantum walk, the probability of first detection decays like (time)((-3)) with superimposed oscillations, with exceptional behavior when the sampling period tau times the tunneling rate. is a multiple of pi/2. The amplitude of the power-law decay is suppressed as tau -> 0 due to the Zeno effect. Our work, an extended version of our previously published paper, predicts rich physical behaviors compared with classical Brownian motion, for which the first passage probability density decays monotonically like (time)(-3/2), as elucidated by Schrodinger in 1915.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据