4.2 Article

Improving water resilience with more perennially based agriculture

期刊

AGROECOLOGY AND SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS
卷 41, 期 7, 页码 799-824

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/21683565.2017.1330795

关键词

Agroforestry; climate variability; continuous living cover; cover crops; perennial crops

资金

  1. Union of Concerned Scientists Kendall Fellowship Program
  2. TomKat Foundation
  3. Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment
  4. Dartmouth College's Porter family fund for sustainability in the curriculum
  5. Richard and Jane Pearl Family Fund for Environmental Studies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Land conversion from natural to managed ecosystems, while necessary for food production, continues to occur at high rates with significant water impacts. Further, increased rainfall variability exposes agricultural systems to impacts from flood and drought events. In many regions, water limitations are overcome through technological approaches such as irrigation and tile drainage, which may not be sustainable in the long term. A more sustainable approach to combat episodes of floods and droughts is to increase soil water storage and the overall green water efficiency of agroecosystems. Agricultural practices that promote continuous living cover, such as perennial grasses, agroforestry and cover crops, can improve water management relative to annual crop systems. Such practices ensure living roots in agricultural systems throughout the year and offer an approach to agroecosystem design that mimics ecological dynamics of native perennial vegetation. We review how these practices have been shown to improve elements of the water balance in a range of environments, with an emphasis on increased soil hydrologic function. A specific focus on the agriculturally intensive state of Iowa provides insight into how land use centered on agroecological principles affords greater water resilience, for individual farms as well as for broader community and ecosystem health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据