4.8 Article

High-pressure carbon dioxide/water pre-treatment of sugarcane bagasse and elephant grass: Assessment of the effect of biomass composition on process efficiency

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 224, 期 -, 页码 639-647

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.101

关键词

Supercritical CO2; Biomass; Lignocellulose; Biorefinery; Hydrolysis

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT/MEC, Portugal) [SFRH/BD/94297/2013, IF/00424/2013]
  2. BBRI - Biomass and Bioenergy Research Infrastructure [ROTEIRO/0189/2013]
  3. Associated Laboratory for Sustainable Chemistry - Clean Processes and Technologies - LAQV
  4. national funds from FCT/MEC [UID/QUI/50006/2013]
  5. ERDF [POCI-01-0145-FEDER 007265]
  6. FCT/MEC and CAPES (Brazil) [FCT/1909/27/2/2014/S, CAPES 371/14, 0005/2015, 23038.002463/2014-98]
  7. CNPq
  8. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/94297/2013] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance of two lignocellulosic biomasses was studied in high-pressure carbon dioxide/ water pre-treatment. Sugarcane bagasse and elephant grass were used to produce C-5-sugars from hemicellulose and, simultaneously, to promote cellulose digestibility for enzymatic saccharification. Different pretreatment conditions, with combined severity factor ranging from -1.17 to -0.04, were evaluated and maximal total xylan to xylose yields of 59.2 wt.% (34.4 wt.% xylooligomers) and 46.4 wt.% (34.9 wt.% xylooligomers) were attained for sugarcane bagasse and elephant grass, respectively. Furthermore, pre-treated biomasses were highly digestible, with glucan to glucose yields of 77.2 mol% and 72.4 mol % for sugarcane bagasse and elephant grass, respectively. High-pressure carbon dioxide/ water pretreatment provides high total C-5-sugars and glucose recovery from both lignocellulosic biomasses; however it is highly influenced by composition and intrinsic features of each biomass. The obtained results confirm this approach as an effective and greener alternative to conventional pre-treatment processes. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据