4.6 Article

Nanofiber diameter as a critical parameter affecting skin cell response

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2014.09.022

关键词

Nanotechnology; Nanofibers; Electrospinning; Proliferation; Regenerative medicine

资金

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [P1-0189, J1-4236, J1-6746, 1000-11-310213]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrospun polymer nanofibers have opened new opportunities in the rapidly evolving field of tissue engineering, particularly due to their topography and variability of available biomaterials. In order to better understand nanofiber influence on cell growth, the impact of their diameter was systematically examined. In this study homogenous, randomly oriented poly(vinyl alcohol) nanofibers with five different average diameters, ranging from 70 nm to 1120 nm, were produced, characterized and their impact on morphology, proliferation and mobility of keratinocytes and skin fibroblasts was evaluated. The results have shown that nanofiber diameter affects cell response and that this response is cell line specific. Nanofiber thickness affected size, morphology and actine organization of keratinocytes much more than fibroblasts. Specifically, the keratinocyte grown on nanofibers were more spherical and smaller compared to the control cells, while the fibroblasts were much less affect. They stayed almost unchanged and spread across growth surface. The cell proliferation determined based on their metabolic activity was the highest, when keratinocytes were grown on 305 nm thick nanofibers, whereas proliferation of fibroblasts grown similar nanofibers was decreased. Finally, fibroblasts exerted higher mobility than keratinocytes. Both tested cell lines on nanofiber diameters of 300 nm resulted in decreased cell mobility. These findings suggest that the control over nanofiber diameter offers promising possibility to better design the tissue scaffolds, since cells distinguish between differently sized nanofibers and respond accordingly. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据