4.6 Article

Influence of a size asymmetric dimer on the structure and differential capacitance of an electric double layer. A Monte Carlo study

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 226, 期 -, 页码 98-103

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.154

关键词

Charged dimers; Ion shape asymmetry; Electric double layer; Grand canonical Monte Carlo simulation

资金

  1. Faculty of Chemistry, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Grand canonical Monte Carlo simulation results are reported for an electric double layer formed by a planar electrode, spherical anions, and dimer cations. The dimer cation consists of two tangentially tethered hard spheres: one is charged and the diameter is fixed at 0.425 nm, while the other is neutral and its diameter can vary and take the following values: 0.0, 0.170, 0.255, 0.340, 0.425, 0.510, 0.680 nm. The ion charge numbers(valencies) are +1 and -1. The ions are immersed in a solvent mimicked by a dielectric continuum medium whose relative permittivity is 8r. The electrolyte concentration is 1 M, and the temperature is 298.15 K. The results for the singlet distribution and the mean orientation functions of charged dimers at the negative electrode show that the large diameter of neutral spheres stabilizes the perpendicular orientation of dimers with charged spheres closer to the electrode. The particle size-asymmetry further leads to a rich double layer structure and asymmetric shaped differential capacitance curves about zero surface charge, similar to that seen in an earlier study involving asynimetric ion valency but symmetric particle size. For a negatively charged electrode and with increasing diameter of the neutral sphere the absolute value of the mean electrostatic potential increases and the differential capacitance decreases. A model of electric dOuble layer is proposed in which two layers of charged spheres are separated by a layer of neutral ones. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据