4.6 Article

Bi SPR-Promoted Z-Scheme Bi2MoO6/CdS-Diethylenetriamine Composite with Effectively Enhanced Visible Light Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Activity and Stability

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 696-706

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03032

关键词

Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution; CdS; Bi2MoO6; Bi; Diethylenetriamine

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51572103, 51502106]
  2. Foundation for Young Talents in College of Anhui Province [gxyqZD2017051]
  3. Key Foundation of Educational Commission of Anhui Province [KJ2016SD53]
  4. Innovation Team of Design and Application of Advanced Energetic Materials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, CdS has been intensively investigated for its excellent photocatalytic hydrogen (H-2) evolution property. However, the poor stability and serious photocorrosion severely influence its potential for practical application. In this work, we successfully synthesized Bi surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-promoted Z-scheme Bi2MoO6 nanosheet/CdS-diethylenetriamine (Bi-Bi2MoO6/CdS-DETA) composites via an in situ solvothermal method. Crystalline structure, morphology, electrochemical properties, along with the photocatalytic H-2 evolution activity and stability, have been systematically investigated. The as-prepared Bi-Bi2MoO6/CdS-DETA composites with optimized structure exhibited advanced photocatalytic H-2 evolution activity (reach to 7.37 mmol h(-1) g(-1)) and high stability. Largely exposed active sites, effective Z-scheme charge separation and Bi metal SPR effect of the two-dimension (2D) heterostructure is contributed to improve H-2 generation performance of Bi-Bi2MoO6/CdS-DETA composites. This work provides an effective way to develop solar energy utilization of CdS-based photocatalysts and guarantees a promising future for design and growth of visible light response and sustainable photocatalytic materials by taking both properties and architectural features into consideration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据