4.6 Article

Production of Hydrocarbon Fuel Using Two-Step Torrefaction and Fast Pyrolysis of Pine. Part 1: Techno-economic Analysis

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 4529-4540

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00372

关键词

Economic feasibility; Hydrocarbon biofuel production; Torrefaction; Fast pyrolysis; Process Simulation

资金

  1. National Science Foundation Sustainable Energy Pathways (SEP) [MPS/CHE-ENG/ECCS-1230803]
  2. Richard and Bonnie Robbins Endowment
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1230803] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As part I of two companion papers, the present paper evaluates the economic feasibility of hydrocarbon biofuel production via two pathways: a one-step production pathway through fast pyrolysis of biomass followed by the catalytic upgrade of bio-oil to a liquid hydrocarbon biofuel and a novel two-step pathway that includes a torrefaction pretreatment step prior to fast pyrolysis and then the catalytic upgrade. These two pathways were modeled using Aspen Plus to process 1000 dry metric tons/day of feed through the fast pyrolysis unit operating at 530 degrees C whereas torrefaction for the two-step pathway was investigated at three different torrefaction temperatures of 290, 310, and 330 degrees C. Three scenarios of producing process heat from natural gas, internal byproducts biochar supplemented with natural gas, and torrefaction condensate were investigated, with additional heat integration considered. Minimum selling price ranged from $4.01/gal to $4.78/gal for the heat-integrated processes whereas the price ranged from $4.70/gal to $6.84/gal without heat integration. Analysis indicated that a one-step pathway and a two-step pathway with torrefaction taking place at 290 degrees C yielded comparable least minimum selling price and it increased with increasing torrefaction temperature. Sensitivity analysis showed that the yield of hydrocarbon biofuel, total project investment, and internal rate of return have the greatest impact.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据