4.6 Article

Enhancement of Hydrogen Evolution from Water Photocatalysis Using Liquid Phase Plasma on Metal Oxide-Loaded Photocatalysts

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 5, 期 5, 页码 3659-3666

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02898

关键词

Liquid phase plasma; Photocatalytic decomposition; Hydrogen evolution; Metal-loaded TiO2; Mesoporous supports

资金

  1. Nano Material Technology Development Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [2016M3A7B4908162]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016M3A7B4908162] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined hydrogen evolution by water photo catalysis using liquid phase plasma on metal oxide-loaded photocatalysts. Metal-loaded TiO2 nanocrystallites supported on mesoporous materials were introduced as photocatalysts. SBA-15 and MCM-41 mesoporous materials were applied as a support for the metal-loaded TiO2 nanocrystallites. The photocatalytic activities of the photocatalysts were estimated for hydrogen production from water. Hydrogen was generated in the photodecomposition of water through liquid phase plasma irradiation. The rate of hydrogen evolution was increased by the metal loading on the TiO2 surface. Photocatalytic activity was improved significantly with Ni loading on the TiO2. The TiO2 nanocrystallites prepared by sol gel method were incorporated above 50 wt % on the MCM-41 mesoporous support. The mesoporous materials acted as an efficient photocatalytic support for the fixation of TiO2. Hydrogen evolution was enhanced with Ni incorporation on the TiO2 supported on the mesoporous supports. The addition of formaldehyde to water induced an apparent enhancement of hydrogen evolution. The formaldehyde assists to improve the hydrogen production with adding of hydrogen by its decomposition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据