4.6 Article

High Rate Biomethanation of Carbon Monoxide-Rich Gases via a Thermophilic Synthetic Coculture

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 2169-2176

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03601

关键词

Methanogenesis; Hydrogenogenesis; Syngas fermentation; Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans; Methanothermobacter thermoautotrophicus; Sabatier process

资金

  1. Netherlands Ministry of Education, Culture and Science [024.002.002]
  2. Netherlands Science Foundation (NWO)
  3. ERC [323009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon monoxide-fermenting microorganisms can be used for the production of a wide range of commodity chemicals and fuels from syngas (generated by gasification of, e.g., wastes or biomass) or industrial off-gases (e.g., from steel industry). Microorganisms are normally more resistant to contaminants in the gas (e.g., hydrogen sulfide) than chemical catalysts, less expensive and self-regenerating. However, some carboxydotrophs are sensitive to high concentrations of CO, resulting in low growth rates and productivities. We hypothesize that cultivation of synthetic cocultures can be used to improve overall rates of CO bioconversion. As a case study, a thermophilic microbial coculture, consisting of Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans and Methanothermobacter thermoautotrophicus was constructed to study the effect of cocultivation on conversion of CO-rich gases to methane. In contrast to the methanogenic monoculture, the coculture was able to efficiently utilize CO or mixtures of H-2/CO/CO2 to produce methane at high efficiency and high rates. In CSTR-bioreactors operated in continuous mode, the coculture converted artificial syngas (66.6% H-2:33.3% CO) to an outflow gas with a methane content of 72%, approaching the 75% theoretical maximum. CO conversion efficiencies of 93% and volumetric production rates of 4 m(methane)(3)/m(liquid)(3)/day were achieved. This case shows that microbial cocultivation can result in a significant improvement of gas-fermentation of CO-rich gases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据