4.6 Article

Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with Integrated Graph and Feature Learning

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/2987378

关键词

Non-negative matrix factorization; manifold learning; feature learning; clustering

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IIS-1218712]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11241005]
  3. Shanxi Scholarship Council of China [2015-093]
  4. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  5. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1218712] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Matrix factorization is a useful technique for data representation in many data mining andmachine learning tasks. Particularly, for data sets with all nonnegative entries, matrix factorization often requires that factor matrices be nonnegative, leading to nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF). One important application of NMF is for clustering with reduced dimensions of the data represented in the new feature space. In this paper, we propose a new graph regularized NMF method capable of feature learning and apply it to clustering. Unlike existing NMF methods that treat all features in the original feature space equally, our method distinguishes features by incorporating a feature-wise sparse approximation error matrix in the formulation. It enables important features to be more closely approximated by the factor matrices. Meanwhile, the graph of the data is constructed using cleaner features in the feature learning process, which integrates feature learning andmanifold learning procedures into a unified NMF model. This distinctly differs from applying the existing graph-based NMF models after feature selection in that, when these two procedures are independently used, they often fail to align themselves toward obtaining a compact and most expressive data representation. Comprehensive experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, which outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms when applied to clustering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据