4.6 Article

Randomness in neural networks: an overview

出版社

WILEY PERIODICALS, INC
DOI: 10.1002/widm.1200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neural networks, as powerful tools for data mining and knowledge engineering, can learn from data to build feature-based classifiers and nonlinear predictive models. Training neural networks involves the optimization of nonconvex objective functions, and usually, the learning process is costly and infeasible for applications associated with data streams. A possible, albeit counterintuitive, alternative is to randomly assign a subset of the networks' weights so that the resulting optimization task can be formulated as a linear least-squares problem. This methodology can be applied to both feedforward and recurrent networks, and similar techniques can be used to approximate kernel functions. Many experimental results indicate that such randomized models can reach sound performance compared to fully adaptable ones, with a number of favorable benefits, including (1) simplicity of implementation, (2) faster learning with less intervention from human beings, and (3) possibility of leveraging overall linear regression and classification algorithms (e.g., l(1) norm minimization for obtaining sparse formulations). This class of neural networks attractive and valuable to the data mining community, particularly for handling large scale data mining in real-time. However, the literature in the field is extremely vast and fragmented, with many results being reintroduced multiple times under different names. This overview aims to provide a self-contained, uniform introduction to the different ways in which randomization can be applied to the design of neural networks and kernel functions. A clear exposition of the basic framework underlying all these approaches helps to clarify innovative lines of research, open problems, and most importantly, foster the exchanges of well-known results throughout different communities. (C) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据