4.6 Article

Conjugation Length Effect on TPA-Based Optical Limiting Performance of a Series of Ladder-Type Chromophores

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/ma10010070

关键词

two-photon absorption; optical limiting; rate equations-field intensity equation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11247307, 11304172, 11304186]
  2. Shandong Province Program on Key Research Projects [2015GGX101017]
  3. Excellent Young Scholars Research Fund of Shandong Normal University
  4. Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program [J12LJ04]
  5. International Cooperation Program for Key Professors by Shandong Provincial Education Department
  6. Subject Construction Funds of Qilu University of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nonlinear optical properties of a series of newly-synthesized ladder-type chromophores containing oligo-p-phenylene moiety with different pi-conjugated lengths were theoretically studied by numerically solving the rate equations and the field intensity equation with an iterative predictor-corrector finite-difference time-domain technique. Ab initio calculation results show that the compounds can be described by the three-level model. Based on the two-photon absorption mechanism, highly efficient optical limiting performances are demonstrated in the chromophores, which strongly depend on the pi-conjugated length of the molecule. Special attention has been paid to the dynamical two-photon absorption, indicating that the parameter of the medium can affect the dynamical two-photon absorption cross section. Our numerical results agree well with the experimental measurements. It reveals that the increase in the pi-conjugated length of ladder-type oligo-p-phenylene for these chromophores leads to enhanced nonlinear optical absorption. The results also provide a method to modulate the optical limiting and dynamical two-photon absorption of the compounds by changing the molecular density and thickness of the absorber.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据