4.6 Article

Non-Point Source Nitrogen and Phosphorus Assessment and Management Plan with an Improved Method in Data-Poor Regions

期刊

WATER
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w10010017

关键词

non-point source pollution; Chenghai; empirical model; nitrogen; phosphorus; source apportionment; scenario analysis

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2016YFC0401701]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51479219]
  3. Program for Innovative Research Team of IWHR for Environmental Impact of Hydraulic Engineering [WE0145B592017]
  4. Comprehensive Regulation and Control Theory and Its Application in Watershed Water Environment [WE0145B532017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To enhance the quantitative simulation and integrated assessment of non-point source (NPS) pollution in plateau lakes in data-poor regions, a simple and practical NPS assessment method is developed by combining the improved export coefficient model (ECM) and the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). This method is evaluated via application to the Chenghai Lake watershed (Yunnan Province, China), which contains a typical plateau lake. The estimated results reflect the actual situation within the watershed. The total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) loads in the study area in 2014 were 360.35 t/a (44.30% dissolved nitrogen (DN) and 55.70% adsorbed nitrogen (AN)) and 86.15 t/a (71.40% adsorbed phosphorus (AP)), respectively. The southern and eastern portions of the watershed are key regions for controlling dissolved and adsorbed pollutants, respectively. Soil erosion and livestock are the main TN and TP pollution sources in the study area and should be controlled first. Additionally, reasonable and practical suggestions are proposed to minimize water pollution according to a scenario analysis. The method in this study provides a foundation for scientific theories that can be used in water resources protection planning and the method can be applied to the NPS assessment of similar regions with scarce data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据