4.6 Article

Constructing Implantable SrTiO3:Yb,Ho Nanofibers for NIR-Triggered and Optically Monitored Chemotherapy

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 23, 期 10, 页码 2423-2431

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201604956

关键词

drug delivery; monitoring; nanostructures; near-IR radiation; pH trigger

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51232006, 51672247]
  2. Major State Research Program of China [2016YFC1101900]
  3. Nature Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY15E020005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Light-responsive and photoluminescent (PL) drug-delivery platforms have sparked fascinating advancements in personalized tumor chemotherapy due to their unique characteristics in biological imaging and manipulated release kinetics. Herein, implantable Yb3+ and Ho3+ co-doped strontium titanate (SrTiO3:Yb,Ho) nanofibers were synthesized and decorated on the surface with polyacrylic acid (PAA) molecules. The preliminary in vitro assay confirmed that this implantable fibrous mesh presented sound cytocompatibility. The PAA surface decoration improved the loading capacity of an anticancer drug (doxorubicin (DOX)) and effectively prevented a daunting burst release in a neutral aqueous environment. Owing to the electrostatic bond between PAA and DOX molecules, low-pH microenvironments and NIR (lambda= 808 nm) irradiation both induced significantly accelerated DOX release and consequently enhanced the local cancer-cell-killing effect. Additionally, the ratio of green-to-red emission (I-545/I-655) from the SrTiO3:Yb,Ho-PAA fibers responded effectively to the DOX release progress and dosage due to a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) effect. This unique characteristic enabled optical monitoring of the delivery progress in a timely manner. These SrTiO3:Yb,Ho-PAA nanofibers, with precise dual-triggering and optical monitoring of DOX release, are expected to serve as a new implantable drug delivery platform for personalized chemotherapy in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据