4.7 Article

Incorporation of implicit decision-maker preferences in multi-objective evolutionary optimization using a multi-criteria classification method

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 50, 期 -, 页码 48-57

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.10.037

关键词

Evolutionary algorithms; Multi-objective optimization; Implicit preferences; Multi-criteria sorting

资金

  1. PRODEP
  2. Autonomous University of Sinaloa [PROFAPI-055/2012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nowadays, most Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEA) concentrate mainly on searching for an approximation of the Pareto frontier to solve a multi-objective optimization problem. However, finding this set does not completely solve the problem. The decision-maker (DM) still has to choose the best compromise solution from that set. But as the number of criteria increases, several important difficulties arise in performing this task. Identifying the Region of Interest (ROI), according to the DM's preferences, is a promising alternative that would facilitate the selection process. This paper approaches the incorporation of preferences into a MOEA in order to characterize the ROI by a multi-criteria classification method. This approach is called Hybrid Multi-Criteria Sorting Genetic Algorithm and is composed of two phases. First, a metaheuristic is used to generate a small set of solutions that are classified in ordered categories by the DM. Thus, the DM's preferences will be reflected indirectly in this set. In the second phase, a multi criteria sorting method is combined with an evolutionary algorithm. The first one is used to classify new solutions. Those classified as 'satisfactory' are used for creating a selective pressure towards the ROI. The effectiveness of our method was proved in nine instances of a public project portfolio problem. The obtained results indicate that our approach achieves a good characterization of the ROI, and outperforms the standard NSGA-II in simple and complex problems. Also, these results confirm that our approach is able to deal with many-objective problems. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据