4.8 Article

Single Pd atoms supported by graphitic carbon nitride, a potential oxygen reduction reaction catalyst from theoretical perspective

期刊

CARBON
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 619-627

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.12.061

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21503210, 21521092, 21673220]
  2. Jilin Province Youth Fund [20130522141JH]
  3. Jilin Province Natural Science Foundation [20150101012JC]
  4. Special Program for Applied Research on Super Computation of the NSFC-Guangdong Joint Fund (the second phase)
  5. Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province [2011GZX0077, 2012JZ0007, 2014HH0049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Designing the low cost, long durability and high efficient substitutes for platinum (Pt) electrocatalyst to facilitate ORR is significant for the large-scale commercial application of fuel cells. In this work, single Pd atoms supported on graphitic carbon nitride (i.e., Pd/g-C3N4) with different Pd coverages acting as electrocatalyst for ORR is investigated by using the density functional theory calculations. Our study shows that the doping of Pd atoms can effectively decompose H2O2, leading to a four-electron mechanism via the sequential hydrogenation of *O-2 giving *O+*H2O on Pdx/g-C3N4 (x = 1-4). With the increase of Pd coverages, the energy barriers increase in the rate determining step, which are 0.39 eV, 0.63 eV, 0.68 eV and 2.61 eV for Pdx/g-C3N4 (x = 1-4), respectively. This implies that Pdx/g-C3N4 (x = 1-3) have lower energy barrier than Pt (calculated value 0.80 eV), showing high ORR activity compared with Pt. The oxidized Pd-2/g-C3N4 (i.e., Pd-2/g-C3N4-O) shows similar ORR activity to Pd-2/g-C3N4, but with different rate determining step. The working potentials are also discussed for the studied catalysts. Especially, the working potential for Pd-2/g-C3N4 is up to 0.60 V, comparable to calculated value 0.73 V for Pt/Cu(100). (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据