4.7 Article

Evaluation of Seed Emergence Uniformity of Mechanically Sown Wheat with UAV RGB Imagery

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs9121241

关键词

wheat; UAV image; uniformity; seedling-missing region; length of region of missing seedlings; area of region of missing seedlings; evaluation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31701355, 31671615]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M600448]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  4. science and technology plan projects of Yangzhou [YZ2016251]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The uniformity of wheat seed emergence is an important characteristic used to evaluate cultivars, cultivation mode and field management. Currently, researchers typically investigated the uniformity of seed emergence by manual measurement, a time-consuming and laborious process. This study employed field RGB images from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to obtain information related to the uniformity of wheat seed emergence and missing seedlings. The calculation of the length of areas with missing seedlings in both drill and broadcast sowing can be achieved by using an area localization algorithm, which facilitated the comprehensive evaluation of uniformity of seed emergence. Through a comparison between UAV images and the results of manual surveys used to gather data on the uniformity of seed emergence, the root-mean-square error (RMSE) was 0.44 for broadcast sowing and 0.64 for drill sowing. The RMSEs of the numbers of missing seedling regions for broadcast and drill sowing were 1.39 and 3.99, respectively. The RMSEs of the lengths of the missing seedling regions were 12.39 cm for drill sowing and 0.20 cm(2) for broadcast sowing. The UAV image-based method provided a new and greatly improved method for efficiently measuring the uniformity of wheat seed emergence. The proposed method could provide a guideline for the intelligent evaluation of the uniformity of wheat seed emergence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据