4.7 Article

Comparison of Satellite-Observed XCO2 from GOSAT, OCO-2, and Ground-Based TCCON

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 9, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs9101033

关键词

OCO-2; GOSAT; XCO2; TCCON; carbon dioxide; validation

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0212600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41627804, 41601351]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project [2016M592389, 2017T100580, 2016M602362]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2042016kf0032, 2042017kf0006]
  5. Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany
  6. EU project ICOS_Inwire
  7. Universite de La Reunion [LACy/UMR8105]
  8. GOSAT project
  9. Australian Research Council [DP0879468, DP110103118, DP140101552]
  10. Australian Bureau of Meteorology
  11. NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory Project
  12. NASA ACOS project
  13. ESA Climate Change Initiative-Greenhouse Gases project
  14. [FR/35/IC2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CO2 is one of the most important greenhouse gases. Its concentration and distribution in the atmosphere have always been important in studying the carbon cycle and the greenhouse effect. This study is the first to validate the XCO2 of satellite observations with total carbon column observing network (TCCON) data and to compare the global XCO2 distribution for the passive satellites Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) and Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT), which are on-orbit greenhouse gas satellites. Results show that since GOSAT was launched in 2009, its mean measurement accuracy was -0.4107 ppm with an error standard deviation of 2.216 ppm since 2009, and has since decreased to -0.62 ppm with an error standard deviation of 2.3 ppm during the past two more years (2014-2016), while the mean measurement accuracy of the OCO-2 was 0.2671 ppm with an error standard deviation of 1.56 ppm from September 2014 to December 2016. GOSAT observations have recently decreased and lagged behind OCO-2 on the ability to monitor the global distribution and monthly detection of XCO2. Furthermore, the XCO2 values gathered by OCO-2 are higher by an average of 1.765 ppm than those by GOSAT. Comparison of the latitude gradient characteristics, seasonal fluctuation amplitude, and annual growth trend of the monthly mean XCO2 distribution also showed differences in values but similar line shapes between OCO-2 and GOSAT. When compared with the NOAA statistics, both satellites' measurements reflect the growth trend of the global XCO2 at a low and smooth level, and reflect the seasonal fluctuation with an absolutely different line shape.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据