4.6 Article

Elevated Neutrophil Elastase in Tears of Ocular Graft-Versus-Host Disease Patients

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 46-52

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.12.026

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (BETHESDA, MARYLAND) [NEI 03306]
  2. BOSTON KERATOPROS-thesis Research Fund at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (Boston, Massachusetts)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To investigate the levels of neutrophil elastase (NE), matrix metalloproteinases (MMIPs), and myeloperoxidase (MPO) in tear washes of patients with ocular graft-vs-host disease (oGVHD). DESIGN: Case-control study. METHODS: Based on established criteria, oGVHD patients (n = 14; 28 eyes) and age-/sex-matched healthy controls (n = 14; 28 eyes) were enrolled. Tear washes were collected and analyzed for NE using a singleanalyte enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). MMPs (1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 12), MPO, and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1 were analyzed using multianalyte bead-based ELISA assays. Total MMP activity was measured using a fluorimetric assay. Correlation studies were performed between NE, MMP-8, MMP9, and MPO within study groups. RESULTS: NE, MMP-8, MMP-9, and MPO levels were elevated in oGVHD tears when compared with controls (P <.0001). NE was the most elevated analyte. MMP activity was higher and TIMP-1 levels were lower in oGVHD than in control (P <.0001). In oGVHD, NE significantly correlated with MMP-8 (r = 0.92), MMP-9 (r = 0.90), and MPO (r = 0.79) (P <.0001). MMP-8 correlated with MMP-9 (r = 0.96, P <.0001), and MPO (r = 0.60, P =.001). MMP-9 correlated with MPO (r = 0.55, P =.002). In controls, NE, MMP-9, and MPO significantly correlated with each other (P <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The marked increase in NE in oGVHD tears that correlated strongly with elevated MMP-8, MMP-9, and MPO suggests a common neutrophilic source and provides evidence of neutrophil activity on the ocular surface of oGVHD patients. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据